Cogeneration produces both electricity and useful heat or cooling energy from the same fuel source. Cogneration, also known as Combined Heat and Power (CHP), typically replaces the traditional method of purchasing electricity from the power grid and then burning natural gas or oil in a furnace to produce heat or steam. The concept has been around since Thomas Edison's first electric generating plant in the 1880s. You'll find Cogeneration systems today in many modern forms such as at chemical processing plants and the utility providers that supply district heating to buildings in major cities. Facilities that use CHP Cogeneration technology include academic institutions, healthclubs, greenhouses, hotels, hospitals, many types of industrial manufacturers and commercial businesses as well as government facilities.Why consider cogen? It makes sense to integrate your power and heating/cooling production needs into one on-site cogeneration system when you consider the traditional way of buying electric energy from a utility is inefficient, wasting as much as 75 percent of the energy in the original fuel due to production and transportation losses. Conversely, cogeneration systems covert about 70 percent to 90 percent of the energy in the fuel that is burned into useful electricity or heat.

Depending on the application, a wide range of facilities that use cogeneration systems achieve up to 35 percent in energy savings. Establishing a cogeneration system on site at your facility also helps to carbon emissions and contributes to building sustainability.
And, thanks to new technology, cogeneration isn't just for municipalities and big business. Advances in lean-burn gas reciprocating engine technology, heat exchangers and digital system controls put cogeneration plants within reach for smaller organizations. Applications as small as 300kW can benefit from these CHP Cogeneration systems.
A cogeneration system starts with a prime mover that turns an alternator to produce electric power and a waste heat recovery system to capture heat from the exhaust and engine-cooling water jacket. The prime mover can be a reciprocating natural gas engine, reciprocating diesel engine, gas turbine, microturbine or fuel cell. The ratio of heat to electricity production differs between reciprocating engines and gas turbine systems. Most CHP Cogeneration systems come within the range of 90 percent to 95 percent for reliability and availability. The most popular type of system is based on the reciprocating engine for its high electrical output per Btu of input energy and overall energy efficiency.
Determining if your facility is a good candidate for cogeneration can be performed with a quick analysis of your energy use. Take a few minutes to answer the following questions:
1. Have you taken all reasonable steps to reduce both electric and heat energy consumption at your facility?
2. Is the base electrical load at your facility greater than 1,000 kW?
3. Is the thermal load at your facility consistent and equivalent to1 million Btu/hr or more?
4. Is the duration of your simultaneous need for heat/cooling and electric power greater than 4,000 hours per year?
5. Are local electric rates high in relation to the local cost and availability of natural gas?
6. Is your physical site suitable for the installation of a congeneration system?
7. Is reliability of electric service a major economic concern?
If you answer "yes" to most of the questions, you might consider doing a more comprehensive payback analysis.

Performing a Payback Analysis. A thorough cost analysis takes into account calculations for electricity costs per kWh, electricity demand charges, cost of natural gas per million Btu, number of anticipated hours of operation per year, utilization of recovered heat and installed cost of the cogeneration system. A consulting engineer that's familiar with cogen systems or a rep from a system manufacturer like Cummins Power Generation can help you crunch the numbers.
If you'd like more information, including a sample payback analysis and additional resources, please click here to download my White Paper on evaluating cogeneration.
The development of large reciprocating generator sets that can run on low Btu (dilute) methane have given us a way to harness waste fuel from landfills, waste treatment plants and coal mines.
The vast resources of methane available from landfills, sewage treatment plants and coalmines make a compelling case for “waste to energy” alone. How the energy is efficiently and economically harnessed makes the difference. Reciprocating engine generator systems are far and away the most popular technology being employed today for producing electricity from natural and man- made sources of methane gas. Some of the reasons for this are, the gaseous- fueled reciprocating engine is a mature technology, new low-Btu industrial engine designs are able to operate at full rated horsepower, the technology is significantly less expensive, the generators are more tolerant of impurities and contaminants that are found in methane from landfills and coal seams, and they operate at higher electrical efficiencies than turbines.
